1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 266 Conn.
  5. 266 Conn. 531 (2003)
 

BONGIORNO SUPERMARKET, INC. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

(SC 16952).

266 Conn. 531 (2003)

BONGIORNO SUPERMARKET, INC., ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released November 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Cacace, with whom, on the brief, were Jane W. Freeman and Ronald E. Kowalski II, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Robert A. Fuller, with whom were Brenden P. Leydon and, on the brief, Nicholas E. Wocl and Joseph J. Tooher, for the appellees (defendant Grade A Market CT Limited Partnership et al.).

Borden, Norcott, Katz, Vertefeuille and Zarella, Js.

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal1 is whether the plaintiffs, Bongiorno Supermarket, Inc. (Bongiorno's), George Bongiorno, Frank Bongiorno and Maurice Nizzardo, were classically aggrieved by the decision of the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the city of Stamford (board), affirming the granting of a permit by Stamford's zoning enforcement officer to the defendants Grade A Market CT Limited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases