1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 304 A.D.2d
  5. 304 A.D.2d 489 (2003)
 

PEOPLE v. JORDAN

304 A.D.2d 489 (2003)

757 N.Y.S.2d 737

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL JORDAN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 29, 2003.

We find that the court's Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see People v Hayes, 97 N.Y.2d 203 [2002]). The factual error, which was minor in this context, had no effect on the ruling and caused no prejudice.

Defendant's challenge to the prosecutor's summation is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases