1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 81 P.3d
  5. 81 P.3d 711 (2003)
 

MORSMAN v. CITY OF MADRAS

2003-040; A122113.

81 P.3d 711 (2003)

191 Or. App. 149

Phillip MORSMAN and Brigitte Morsman, Petitioners, v. CITY OF MADRAS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 9, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael F. Sheehan, Scappoose, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Robert Lovlien, Bend, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Bryant, Lovlien & Jarvis, P.C.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and SCHUMAN, Judges.

SCHUMAN, J.

The City of Madras passed an ordinance annexing some contiguous territory. Petitioners, who own a trailer park in the annexed area, appealed the annexation to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), alleging, among other things, that the annexation did not meet the "reasonableness" requirement imposed by earlier cases from this court and the Supreme Court. Petitioners also alleged that the annexation was void because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases