Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied without a hearing. Defendant's conclusory allegations failed to address the highly specific factual information supplied by the People and did not raise a factual issue as to probable cause for his arrest (compare People v Gonzalez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. WARD
304 A.D.2d 485 (2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 735
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC WARD, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 29, 2003.
Decided April 29, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.