1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 100 S.W.3d
  5. 100 S.W.3d 689 (2003)
 

CITY OF DOVER v. CITY OF RUSSELLVILLE

No. 02-308.

100 S.W.3d 689 (2003)

CITY OF DOVER v. CITY OF RUSSELLVILLE.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 13, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCormick Law Firm, P.A. by: David H. McCormick, Russellville, for appellant.

Dunham & Faught, P.A., by: James Dunham; William F. Smith, III; and Alex G. Street, Russellville, for appellee.

JIM HANNAH, Justice.

The City of Dover ("Dover") appeals a judgment granting a dismissal with prejudice where the trial court found that Dover lacked standing to contest an annexation election. Dover alleges that the trial court erred in finding that it has no rights entitling it to sue. Dover asserts that it is the property owner of land annexed in the election, and therefore it may contest the election. We hold that judicial review of elections in municipal annexation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases