IN RE THOMAS

(AC 23301).

77 Conn. App. 1 (2003)

IN RE THOMAS J.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released May 27, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Connolly, supervisory assistant public defender, with whom, on the brief, was Christine Perra Rapillo, supervisory assistant public defender, for the appellant (respondent).

Stephen G. Vitelli, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

Foti, Dranginis and Freedman, Js.


Opinion

FOTI, J.

The respondent, Thomas J., appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court denying his motion for review.1 On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly interpreted General Statutes § 17a-16,2 thereby depriving him of his right to due process.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases