Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order entered October 8, 2002, as denied that branch of plaintiff's motion which was denominated as one to vacate the prior order pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1), but, in effect, was treated as one for leave to reargue the prior motion is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order entered July 31, 2001, is affirmed; and it is further,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.