Harry JOHNSON, Appellant (C7-01-1676),
Margot Siegel, et al., Appellants (C4-01-1683),
v.
The CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 14, 2003.
August 14, 2003.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael C. Mahoney, Mahoney & Hagberg, Wayzata, MN, David F. Herr, Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellants.
Susan Lee Trammele, Minneapolis City Attorney Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent.
Susan Lynn Naughton, St. Paul, MN, Amicus Attorney League of Minn. Cities.
Paul Thomas Eidsness, Chanhassen, MN, Amicus Attorney Minnesotans for Protection of Constitutional Standards.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.
Appellants commenced an inverse condemnation action1 against respondents, the City of Minneapolis and its development agency, the Minneapolis Community Development Agency (hereinafter referred to collectively as "the City"), seeking compensation for the diminishment in rents and value of their properties caused by a "cloud of condemnation" over their properties for many years while respondents...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
