ROBERSON v. PAINEWEBBER, INC.

No. 97,278.

81 P.3d 688 (2003)

2003 OK CIV APP 100

John R. ROBERSON, David B. Magill, and Andrew O'Dwyer, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. PAINEWEBBER, INC.; Painewebber Group, Inc.; Lehman Brothers, Inc.; Smith Barney, Inc.; Blythe Eastman Painewebber Servicing, Inc.; Fourth Street Associates; RMM Corporation; AJ Corporation; Greater Southwestern Funding Corporation; PHC Corporation; and Midtown Associates Limited Partnership, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

Rehearing Denied August 11, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Michael Barkley, Brad Smith, Elizabeth A. Ballard, Barkely, Titus, Hillis & Reynolds, PLLC, Tulsa, OK, and, Joel H. Bernstein, Esq., David J. Goldsmith, Esq., Goodkind Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow, LLP, New York, NY, and, Laurence L. Pinkerton, Judith A. Finn, Pinkerton & Finn, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Andrew R. Turner, P. Scott Hathaway, Conner & Winters, Tulsa, OK, and, John T. Schmidt, Willcox & Savage, Norfolk, VA, for Defendants/Appellees UBS Financial Services, Inc., formerly UBS PaineWebber, Inc.; UBS Americas, Inc.; Greater Southwestern Funding Corporation.

Charles A. Gilman, George Wailand, Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, L.L.P. formerly Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, New York, NY, and, Reuben Davis, Scott R. Rowland, Boone, Smith, Davis, Hurst & Dickman, Tulsa, OK, for Defendants/Appellees UBS Financial Services, Inc., formerly known as UBS Paine-Webber, Inc. and UBS Americas, Inc.


Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

Opinion by KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiffs sought class certification to pursue their allegations of fraud in the marketing and sale of high-risk corporate bonds against Defendants. The trial court denied the application finding that Plaintiffs "failed to establish that the relevant questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases