ISCO INTERN., INC. v. CONDUCTUS, INC.

No. 01-487 GMS.

279 F.Supp.2d 489 (2003)

ISCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff v. CONDUCTUS, INC., and Superconductor Technologies, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

August 21, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard H. Richards, III of Richards Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Delaware, and John F. Sweeney, Mark J. Abate, and Tony V. Pezzano of Morgan & Finnegan, L.L.P., New York, New York, for Plaintiff.

Richard L. Horwtiz, and David E. Moore of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, and Donald F. Parsons, Jr. of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, of New York, New York (Lawrence B. Goodwin, Daniel Basov, and Dennis C. Hopkins of counsel), Heller Herman White & Mcauliffe LLP, Menlo Park, California (Alexander Brainerd, Michael K. Plimack, and Christian E. Mammen of counsel) for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

SLEET, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff, ISCO International, Inc. ("ISCO"), filed the above-captioned suit against Conductus, Inc. ("Conductus") and Superconductor Technologies, Inc. ("STI") on July 17, 2001, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,263,215 ("the '215 patent"). A thirteen-day jury trial was held between March 17 and April 2, 2003. On April 3, 2003, the jury returned a verdict finding that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases