BEPAT v. CHANDLER


2 A.D.3d 764 (2003)

769 N.Y.S.2d 731

YONGWATTIE BEPAT et al., Respondents, v. GREGORY CHANDLER, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 29, 2003.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

While a motion for leave to renew is generally based upon the discovery of material facts which were unknown to the movant at the time of the original motion (see CPLR 2221 [e] [2]), the Supreme Court has the discretion to grant renewal even upon facts known to the movant at that time (see J. D. Structures v Waldbaum, 282 A.D.2d 434 [2001]). Under the circumstances of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases