AMARIS v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION


304 A.D.2d 457 (2003)

758 N.Y.S.2d 637

MIGUEL AMARIS, Appellant, v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 22, 2003.


In view of the loss of key evidence that defendant never had an opportunity to examine, the court properly granted summary judgment as a sanction for spoliation (see Mudge, Rose, Guthrie, Alexander & Ferdon v Penguin A.C. Corp., 221 A.D.2d 243 [1995]). Plaintiff made no showing that defendant was on notice that he intended to commence litigation until one year following the accident. Although he was aware the television that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases