Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in permitting a police officer to testify that the defendant admitted ownership of the store in which a bag containing heroin was discovered during the execution of a search warrant. However, the defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Gray,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.