Mary K. SULZER, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant-Petitioner,
v.
Mary Susan DIEDRICH, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Respondent.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Oral argument May 27, 2003.
Decided July 3, 2003.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the plaintiff-respondent-cross-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by C. Michael Hausman, Steven W. Jelenchick, and C. Michael Hausman & Associates, Ltd., Delafield, and oral argument by Steven W. Jelenchick and C. Michael Hausman.
For the defendant-appellant-cross-respondent there was a brief by John K. Brendel and Brendel Law Offices, Brookfield, and oral argument by John K. Brendel.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.
The petitioner, Mary Sulzer (Sulzer), seeks review of a published court of appeals decision that reversed an order of the circuit court.1 The circuit court order vacated its initial order imposing a constructive trust. Instead, it awarded Sulzer a money judgment in connection with the division of the retirement accounts of her former husband, Fred Diedrich (Fred...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.