MARTINEZ v. SCHLUMBERGER, LTD.

No. 02-20173.

338 F.3d 407 (2003)

William MARTINEZ; Frank Ditta; and Lafayette Kirksey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCHLUMBERGER, LTD.; and Schlumberger Technology Corp., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 9, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin A. Shellist (argued), Shellist, Lore & Lazarz, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Tony P. Rosenstein, Katherine Traverse Vukadin (argued), Baker Botts, Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.


PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA")1 imposes upon a company that acts as administrator of its employee benefit program a duty to truthfully disclose, upon inquiry from plan participants or beneficiaries, whether it is considering amending the benefit plan. Although the majority of other circuits have already confronted this issue,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases