1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 301 A.D.2d
  5. 301 A.D.2d 442 (2003)
 

HELMSLEY-SPEAR, INC. v. KUPFERSCHMID

301 A.D.2d 442 (2003)

752 N.Y.S.2d 884

HELMSLEY-SPEAR, INC., Appellant, v. LAWRENCE KUPFERSCHMID, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 21, 2003.

Since the sale of the subject property and plaintiff broker's entitlement to a commission thereon were contingent upon the satisfaction of a condition which went unsatisfied through no fault of defendant Lawrence Kupferschmid, summary judgment dismissing the complaint against Lawrence Kupferschmid was proper (compare Carnegie v Abrams, 37 A.D.2d 327 and Heelan Realty & Dev. Corp. v Skyview Meadows Dev. Corp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases