1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 254 F.Supp.2d
  5. 254 F.Supp.2d 486 (2003)
 

SOUTH CAMDEN CITIZENS IN ACTION v. NEW JERSEY DEP.

Civil Action No. 01-702.

254 F.Supp.2d 486 (2003)

SOUTH CAMDEN CITIZENS IN ACTION, Geneva Sanders, Pauline Woods, Barbara Pfeiffer, Julita Gilliard, Oscar Lisboa, Phyllis Holmes, Gwen Peterson, Latoya Cooper, Julio Lugo, Lula Williams, and Sharon Christie Potter, Plaintiffs, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and Bradley M. Campbell, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, in his official capacity, Defendants, and St. Lawrence Cement Co., L.L.C., Defendant-Intervenor.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

April 16, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Olga D. Pomar, Esq., South Jersey Legal Services, Inc., Camden, NJ, Jerome Baiter, Esq., Michael Churchill, Esq., Pu lic Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, Luke W. Cole, Esq., Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs, South Camden Citizens in Action, Geneva Sanders, Pauline Woods, Barbara Pfeiffer, Julita Gilliard, Oscar Lisboa, Phyllis Holmes, Gwen Peterson, Latoya Cooper, Julio Lugo, Lula Williams, and Sharon Christie Potter.

Peter C. Harvey, Esq., Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, Stefanie Brand, Esq., John M. Van Dalen, Esq., Deputies Attorney General, R.J. Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, NJ, for Defendants, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Bradley M. Campbell, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

Brian S. Montag, Esq., Catherine A. Trinkle, Esq., Mary E. Storella, Esq., Kathryn E. Tagliareni, Esq., Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, LLP, Newark, NJ, for the DefendanHntervenor, St. Lawrence Cement Co., LLC.

OPINION

ORLOFSKY, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.   Introduction......................................  489

II.  Procedural History...............................   489

III. Legal Standard Governing Motions to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.
      12(b)(6).........................................   493

IV.  Discussion....................................   ....493

     A. Intentional Discrimination under § 601 of Title...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases