SHUNG LAM v. CHUNG-KO CHENG


196 Misc.2d 538 (2003)

762 N.Y.S.2d 759

WING SHUNG LAM et al., Respondents, v. CHUNG-KO CHENG et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 23, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh H. Mo, P.C., and Carro Velez Carro & Mitchell, LLP, New York City (John Carro of counsel), for appellants.

Alterman & Boop, P.C., and Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York City (David B. Toscano of counsel), for respondents.

GANGEL-JACOB and SCHOENFELD, JJ., concur; McCOOE, J.P., dissents in a separate opinion.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered on or about August 31, 2001 affirmed, with $10 costs.

The action, sounding in defamation, was tried over numerous court days spanning more than a month and culminated, after tumultuous deliberations, in a jury verdict largely favorable to defendants. In support of their CPLR 4404 motion to set aside the verdict, plaintiffs submitted affidavits by two jurors, Daniel and Garrison, the latter the jury foreperson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases