The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of identification and credibility were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations. We note that the victim made a prompt, spontaneous and reliable identification of defendant. The victim's testimony as to the extent and duration of his injuries satisfied the requisite element of physical injury (see People v Guidice,<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.