The victims' testimony regarding threats and bribe offers made to them by a person claiming to be defendant's cousin was properly received because there was enough circumstantial evidence to connect this conduct to defendant and to permit the jury to draw an inference as to his consciousness of guilt (see People v Cotto,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.