1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 60 P.3d
  5. 60 P.3d 663 (2003)
 

HAMMACK v. HAMMACK

No. 27992-4-II.

60 P.3d 663 (2003)

114 Wash.App. 805

In re the Marriage of Duncan W. HAMMACK, Appellant, v. Jeannette B. HAMMACK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

January 3, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael T. Schein, Reed, Longyear, Malnati, Ahrens & Strickland, PS, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Clayton Lee Spencer, Spencer & Sundstrom PLLC, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent.

BRIDGEWATER, J.

Duncan and Jeannette Hammack's dissolution gave a disparate share of the couple's property to Duncan in exchange for Jeanette not being required to pay child support for their remaining minor child. We uphold the trial court's vacation of the dissolution decree concerning the property settlement under CR 60(b)(11) as an extraordinary circumstance. We hold that the agreement for Duncan to receive a disparate share of the property was not a prepayment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases