Even if we were to accept, for the purpose of the motion to dismiss, that plaintiff's conflicting allegations may be interpreted as stating a claim against defendant for misrepresentation of a present fact collateral to the engagement letter (see Deerfield Communications Corp. v Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.