The court properly denied defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment based on the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law (Workers' Compensation Law §§ 11, 29 [6]) since conflicting deposition testimony raises factual issues as to whether defendant-appellant exerted complete and exclusive control over plaintiff's work so as to render it plaintiff's special employer (see Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.