McANDREWS v. CITY OF NEW YORK


100 N.Y.2d 603 (2003)

801 N.E.2d 371

769 N.Y.S.2d 151

WILLIAM McANDREWS et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 16, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Ellen Ravitch of counsel), for appellants.

Kuharski & Levitz, LLP, New York City (Lonny R. Levitz of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO and READ concur in memorandum.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted for a new trial.

Despite defendant's timely request, the trial court did not adequately charge the jury concerning the standard of conduct actionable under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 (e). The statutory recklessness standard is exacting (see Saarinen v Kerr,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases