1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 317 F.3d
  5. 317 F.3d 385 (2003)
 

BOND v. BLUM

Nos. 02-1139, 02-1219, 02-1231, 02-1288.

317 F.3d 385 (2003)

William C. BOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth BLUM, Sr.; Kenneth Blum, Jr.; Dudley F.B. Hodgson; McDaniel, Bennett & Griffin; Adelberg, Rudow, Dorf & Hendler, LLC; Christopher W. Nicholson; William Slavin, Defendants-Appellees. William C. Bond, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adelberg, Rudow, Dorf & Hendler, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and Kenneth Blum, Sr.; Kenneth Blum, Jr.; Dudley F.B. Hodgson; McDaniel, Bennett & Griffin, Defendants. William C. Bond, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Adelberg, Rudow, Dorf & Hendler, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and Kenneth Blum, Sr.; Kenneth Blum, Jr.; Dudley F.B. Hodgson; McDaniel, Bennett & Griffin, Defendants. William C. Bond, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McDaniel, Bennett & Griffin, Defendant-Appellant, and Adelberg, Rudow, Dorf & Hendler, LLC; Kenneth Blum, Sr.; Kenneth Blum, Jr.; Dudley F.B. Hodgson, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided January 24, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Howard J. Schulman, Schulman & Kaufman, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. William Fitts Ryan, Jr., Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland; Andrew Radding, Adelberg, Rudow, Dorf & Hendler, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Amy E. Askew, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland; J. Andrew McKinney, Adelberg, Rudow, Dorf & Hendler, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland; Gerard P. Martin, Thy C. Pham, Martin, Snyder & Bernstein, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland; Kathryn M. Goldman, Jiranek, Goldman & Minton, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge MICHAEL joined.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge.

On a motion for summary judgment filed in this copyright infringement action, the district court held that the defendants' copying of a copyrighted manuscript for introduction into evidence in a state-court child-custody proceeding constituted a "fair use" of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases