1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 66 P.3d
  5. 66 P.3d 630 (2003)
 

KLOEPFEL v. BOKOR

No. 72436-9.

66 P.3d 630 (2003)

149 Wash.2d 192

Judy KLOEPFEL, Respondent, v. Joseph BOKOR, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 17, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Perdue, Spokane, for Petitioner.

Thomas Conrad, Spokane, for Respondent.

Keating, Bucklin & McCormack, Stewart A. Estes, Seattle, Debra Stephens, Bryan Harnetiaux, Spokane, for amicus curiae on behalf of Wash. Defense Trial Lawyers.

SANDERS, J.

The Court of Appeals affirmed a $60,000 judgment in favor of Judy Kloepfel against Joseph Bokor for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The issue here is whether the tort of outrage1 requires proof of severe emotional distress by objective symptomatology and a medical diagnosis. Division One has required proof of objective symptomatology while Division Three in the case before us did not. We hold that the objective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases