1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 308 A.D.2d
  5. 308 A.D.2d 386 (2003)
 

PERCHUK v. HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN OF GREATER NEW YORK

308 A.D.2d 386 (2003)

764 N.Y.S.2d 621

FLORENCE PERCHUK, Respondent, v. HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN OF GREATER NEW YORK et al., Defendants. LAW OFFICES OF MELVIN KREIDMAN, Nonparty Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided September 23, 2003.

Upon review of the record, including the law firm's claimed but undocumented expenditures of time, we find that the law firm fails to show that its compensation pursuant to the fee schedule in Judiciary Law § 474-a (2) would be inadequate (see Yalango v Popp, 84 N.Y.2d 601 [1994]). We have considered and rejected the law firm's other arguments, and find it unnecessary to address the client's other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases