1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 246 F.Supp.2d
  5. 246 F.Supp.2d 446 (2003)
 

BRUNSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. ARBITRON, INC.

No. 02-3223.

246 F.Supp.2d 446 (2003)

BRUNSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. ARBITRON, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

February 21, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce Bellingham and David B. Picker, Spector Gadon & Rosen PC, Philadelphia, PA, Alfred Fabricant and Marc Lieberstein, Ostrolenk Faber Gerb & Soffen LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant.

Robert J. Sugarman, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM

BAYLSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved for Reconsideration and Clarification in part, regarding the Court's Memorandum and Order dated December 31, 2002, inter alia, dismissing Plaintiffs antitrust claims and giving Plaintiff leave to amend its claims for negligence and disparagement.

The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases