Defendant's argument that his conviction of attempted first-degree robbery was unsupported by legally sufficient evidence is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the evidence warranted a rational inference that defendant grabbed at the victim's bracelet with intent to steal it, and that defendant's use of a razor-like weapon was intended, at least in part, to accomplish the theft of the bracelet...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
