Defendant's challenge to the court's supplementary charge given in response to a note from the deliberating jury claiming an inability to reach a unanimous verdict is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the supplementary charge as a whole conveyed the proper principles, was sufficiently balanced, and was not coercive (see People v Ford,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. JAMES
304 A.D.2d 384 (2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 749
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PRISCILLA JAMES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 10, 2003.
Decided April 10, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
