1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 308 A.D.2d
  5. 308 A.D.2d 372 (2003)
 

BROWNE v. PRIME CONTRACTING DESIGN CORP.

308 A.D.2d 372 (2003)

764 N.Y.S.2d 269

KENNETH BROWNE et al., Respondents, v. PRIME CONTRACTING DESIGN CORP., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided September 18, 2003.

The hearsay statements of defendant's field supervisor were properly admitted as admissions by defendant on the issue of its knowledge of the existence and extent of the danger presented by the parapet wall (see Navedo v 250 Willis Ave. Supermarket, 290 A.D.2d 246 [2002]). Some of these admissions, which were similarly to the effect that the wall was in danger of collapsing, were independently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases