The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. Defendant's intent to steal property and cause physical injury could be readily inferred from the evidence properly credited by the jury. Although defendant argues that he was suffering from a psychiatric disability which impaired his ability to form the requisite intent to commit the crimes...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
