1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 5 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 5 Cal.Rptr.3d 668 (2003)
 

SLAUSON PARTNERSHIP v. OCHOA

No. B162900.

5 Cal.Rptr.3d 668 (2003)

112 Cal.App.4th 1005

SLAUSON PARTNERSHIP et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Richard OCHOA, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

As Modified October 29 and November 6, 2003.

Rehearing Denied November 7, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reich, Adell, Crost & Cvitan, J. David Sackman and Carlos Perez, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

Roger Jon Diamond, Santa Monica, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

MUÑNOZ (AURELIO), J.*

Richard Ochoa (Ochoa) appeals from an order denying his special motion to strike plaintiffs' complaint under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 425.16.2 He contends that free speech activities in protest of an adult strip theater at plaintiffs' minimall are protected by the California Constitution's free speech...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases