1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 325 F.3d
  5. 325 F.3d 346 (2003)
 

HANDY v. SHAW, BRANSFORD, VEILLEUX & ROTH

No. 01-7129.

325 F.3d 346 (2003)

Dorothy HANDY, Appellant, v. SHAW, BRANSFORD, VEILLEUX & ROTH, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 18, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorothy Handy argued the cause pro se.

Aaron L. Handleman argued the cause for the appellee. George S. Mahaffey, Jr. was on brief for the appellee.

Before: HENDERSON, RANDOLPH and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON.

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Dorothy Handy appeals pro se the dismissal of her malpractice lawsuit against the law firm of Shaw, Bransford, Veilleux & Roth (Shaw). She asserts that the district court erred in ruling that Rule 13 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure required her to file her malpractice claim against Shaw...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases