The court properly denied appellant's suppression motion. Although the presentment agency has not met its burden of proving that appellant consented to the school safety agent's seizure of his box cutter, the seizure was justified by reasonable suspicion. We conclude that the actions of the school safety agent, a civilian employee of the Police Department assigned exclusively to school security, were subject to the reasonable suspicion standard applicable to searches and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
