The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The evidence clearly warranted the conclusion that defendant was a participant in the crime, whose role was to distract the victim while defendant's companion picked the victim's pocket.
The court properly exercised its discretion in receiving testimony from a well-qualified expert on...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
