The motion court, in granting plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, properly determined that defendant Board of Education utilized an improper calculation to determine if plaintiffs were entitled to a suspension of part or all of the Board's 2% prompt payment discount based on increased insurance costs. Neither the language of the contract nor the undisputed purpose of the suspension provisions, i.e., to provide relief to contractors where insurance costs for their matrons...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
