U.S. v. ARREDONDO

No. 02-1394.

349 F.3d 310 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo ARREDONDO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: November 13, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Brunson (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Bay City, MI, for Appellee.

Kevin M. Schad (argued and briefed), Schad & Cook, Indian Springs, OH, for Appellant. James A. Brunson, Assistant United States Attorney, Bay City, MI, for Appellee.

Before BOGGS, Chief Judge; and KRUPANSKY and CLAY, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

BOGGS, Chief Judge.

The district court held Ricardo Arredondo in criminal contempt of court after finding that he gave fabricated evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel to support his petition for postconviction relief from a federal sentence for drug trafficking. Mr. Arredondo appeals from this contempt conviction and from the district court's accompanying denial of relief from his drug sentence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases