SAKS v. FRANKLIN COVEY CO.

Docket No. 00-9598.

316 F.3d 337 (2003)

Rochelle SAKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANKLIN COVEY CO. and Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided January 15, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darnley D. Stewart, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, LLP, (Daniel L. Berger, Leah Guggenheimer, on the brief), New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Steven C. Bednar Manning Curtis Bradshaw & Bednar LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendants-Appellees.

Jonathan S. Franklin, Hogan & Hartson LLP, Washington, DC (Catherine E. Stetson, on the brief), for Amicus Curiae American Society for Reproductive Medicine, in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before: WALKER, Chief Judge, F.I. PARKER and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.


JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge.

This case raises the question of whether unlawful discrimination occurs when a woman is denied coverage for infertility treatments that can only be performed on women. After plaintiff-appellant Rochelle Saks was denied coverage for certain infertility procedures under her employee health benefits plan, she sued her employer, Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc., and its parent company, Franklin Covey Co. (collectively, "Franklin Covey...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases