IN the MATTER OF the REFUSAL OF Richard L. VERKLER:
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Richard L. VERKLER, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted on briefs November 18, 2002.
Decided January 29, 2003.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Christopher A. Mutschler of Anderegg & Mutschler, LLP of Fond du Lac.
On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas L. Storm, district attorney.
On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, there was a supplemental brief filed by Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general, and Susan M. Crawford, assistant attorney general.
Before Brown, Anderson and Snyder, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. BROWN, J.
In State v. Reitter,227 Wis.2d 213, 217-18, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999), our supreme court held that law officers are under no affirmative duty to advise custodial defendants that the right to counsel does not apply to the implied consent setting. However, the court also appears to have held that, as a matter of due process, if an officer either explicitly assures or implicitly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.