1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 1 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 1 Cal.Rptr.3d 650 (2003)
 

PEOPLE v. NEAL

No. S106440.

1 Cal.Rptr.3d 650 (2003)

31 Cal.4th 63

72 P.3d 280

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kenneth Ray NEAL, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

July 14, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor J. Morse, under appointment by the Supreme Court, San Francisco, for Defendant and Appellant.

John T. Philipsborn, San Francisco, and Charles D. Weisselberg, for California Attorneys for Criminal Justice as Amicus Curiae on behalf Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, David P. Druliner and Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Louis Vasquez, Janet Neeley, Robert P. Whitlock and Lloyd G. Carter, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

GEORGE, C.J.

It long has been settled under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution that an involuntary statement obtained by a law enforcement officer from a criminal suspect by coercion is inadmissible in a criminal proceeding. (See, e.g., Brown v. Mississippi (1936) 297 U.S. 278, 285-286, 56 S.Ct. 461, 80 L.Ed. 682.) In Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases