1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 119 S.W.3d
  5. 119 S.W.3d 527 (2003)
 

BRISTOW v. STATE

No. CA CR 02-1109.

119 S.W.3d 527 (2003)

82 Ark.App. 145

Jeff BRISTOW and Dana Bradford v. STATE of Arkansas.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III.

May 14, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne Emmons, Marion; and Bart Ziegenhorn, West Memphis, for appellants.

Mike Bebee, Atty. Gen., by: Clayton K. Hodges, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

JOHN F. STROUD, JR., Chief Judge.

After the trial court's denial of their motions to suppress, appellants, Jeff Bristow and Dana Bradford, purportedly entered conditional pleas of guilty pursuant to Rule 24.3(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. Bristow pleaded guilty to manufacture of a controlled substance, methamphetamine; he was sentenced to eight years in the Arkansas Department of Correction, to be followed by a ten-year suspended imposition of sentence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases