1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 130 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 512 (2003)
 

OTTO v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.

No. B156010.

130 Cal.Rptr.2d 512 (2003)

106 Cal.App.4th 328

Kevin OTTO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

As Modified February 14, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lackie & Dammeier LLP, Dieter C. Dammeier, Rancho Cucamonga, and Michael A. Morguess for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Elwood Lui, Allison Michael, Los Angeles, and Elizabeth Rees for Defendants and Respondents.

CROSKEY, J.

Petitioner Kevin Otto ("Otto") appeals from a post-judgment order denying his Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 motion for attorney's fees.1 Otto is a public safety officer employed by the Los Angeles Unified School District ("the District"). This is the second time we have considered his case.

By published opinion, we reversed a judgment entered against Otto on his Code of Civil Procedure section 1085 petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases