1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 306 A.D.2d
  5. 306 A.D.2d 332 (2003)
 

NIEVES v. TOMONSKA

306 A.D.2d 332 (2003)

760 N.Y.S.2d 682

MARIA NIEVES, Respondent, v. EUGENIA TOMONSKA, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 9, 2003.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

An application for a continuance or adjournment is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the grant or denial thereof will be upheld on appellate review if the trial court providently exercised its discretion (see Wolosin v Campo, 256 A.D.2d 332 [1998]; Matter of Alario v DeMarco, 149 A.D.2d 587 [1989]). Contrary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases