The trial court properly exercised its discretion in restricting both sides from questioning prospective jurors regarding the facts pertaining to defendant's two prior convictions for crimes similar to those charged herein (People v Smith,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SCHAEFER
302 A.D.2d 333 (2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 879
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DIANE SCHAEFER, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 27, 2003.
Decided February 27, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.