The evidence adduced, most notably the report of the psychiatric expert noting that respondent mother did not recognize the importance of interaction and communication with the subject child, fairly supported Family Court's determination that it was in the child's best interests to place him in petitioner father's care and custody. Favoring this disposition as well is the circumstance that petitioner will also have custody of the subject child's two older siblings (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
