In interpreting the subject escrow agreement, the motion court properly consulted another agreement between plaintiff Silverman and defendant Solow referenced by the escrow agreement. There is no merit to Solow's claim that the escrow agreement obligated Silverman to prove that all the expenses to be reimbursed by means of the escrowed funds were incurred in the fee acquisition and not in the leasehold purchase. The unrebutted documentation amply established Silverman's payment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
