1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 1 A.D.3d
  5. 1 A.D.3d 617 (2003)
 

PEOPLE v. QUIND

1 A.D.3d 617 (2003)

767 N.Y.S.2d 660

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS QUIND, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 24, 2003.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention on appeal, the Supreme Court's Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371 [1974]) was a provident exercise of discretion. By limiting cross-examination to selected aspects of the defendant's criminal record, the Supreme Court properly balanced the probative value of such evidence against its prejudicial effects (see People v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases