BONO v. CITY OF NY


2 Misc.3d 59 (2003)

774 N.Y.S.2d 250

ANTHONY BONO et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

December 22, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roura & Melamed, New York City, and Alexander J. Wulwick, New York City, for appellants.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Francis F. Caputo and Paul L. Herzfeld of counsel), for respondent.

PESCE, P.J., ARONIN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

It was uncontroverted at the framed issue hearing in this matter, held to determine whether plaintiff Anthony Bono was a special employee of defendant, that "all essential, locational and commonly recognizable components of the work relationship" were between Bono and the City of New York (see Thompson v Grumman Aerospace...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases