Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of robbery in the second degree because the People failed to establish his identity as the robber or his intent to commit robbery. The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his intent to commit robbery is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.